ATHENS, Ga. — Attorneys representing Jose Antonio Ibarra, the man accused of murdering Laken Riley while on campus at the University of Georgia in Athens in February, have filed to have evidence suppressed, witnesses barred from testifying and to have the trial moved to a new location.
Defense attorneys argue that Ibarra’s trial should be moved to a new location because the abundance of media coverage makes it difficult for him to get a fair trial.
Prosecutors spent Friday morning calling witnesses, including two police officers who were involved in Ibarra’s arrest.
During their testimony, prosecutors played body camera footage that showed his arrest. In the video, Ibarra can be seen shaking his head and appearing to crack a smile.
Channel 2′s Michael Seiden says friends and family of Riley’s in the courtroom were very emotional. He said her mother sobbed in court several times.
On the other hand, Ibarra, listening through a translator, showed no emotion throughout the entire hearing.
The judge did not make a ruling on whether or not to move the trial outside of Athens.
The judge also chose not to sever a peeping tom charge from the case. Defense attorneys argued it should be been because it involved a victim unrelated to this case.
The trial is currently set to start jury selection on Nov. 13 with opening statements expected to start the following week.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
Channel 2 Action News previously reported that some of the evidence at trial, specifically the DNA evidence in the case, was already moved to a later hearing in November.
Court records from the Clarke County Superior Court show that Ibarra’s defense team has filed motions to:
- Separate his peeping Tom charge from the rest of the trial, citing an unrelated victim to the case
- Suppress evidence collected from social media accounts associated with or used by Ibarra, as well as the contents of two phones seized by law enforcement and location data supplied by Google
- Allow a fingerprint expert to testify virtually due to an inability to travel to court in person
- Move the trial location to avoid a potentially prejudiced jury due to the high publicity of the case
Ibarra is accused of hitting and strangling Riley, with the intent to sexually assault her, on Feb. 22. He was arrested in Athens the next day, Feb. 23. Riley was found near running trails on campus after one of her friends told police she had not returned from a run earlier that morning.
In connection to Riley’s death, Ibarra was charged with malice murder, multiple counts of felony murder and counts for kidnapping, aggravated assault, aggravated battery, hindering a phone call to emergency services and tampering with evidence.
Attorneys for Ibarra said the process law enforcement used to seize evidence and search for more regarding the Riley murder case against Ibarra were performed unlawfully, and have asked that the state bar the evidence produced from those actions.
According to court filings, search warrants obtained after Ibarra’s detention by UGA police officers on Feb. 23 “without reasonable suspicion that he had committed any offense” happened when he was arrested without a warrant at his apartment and kept after despite what the attorneys say was an absence of probable cause.
After Ibarra was detained, a UGA detective got a search warrant for his apartment, which Ibarra’s lawyers say was “void on its face” and issued without probable cause while also being overly broad for what officers could look for and seize as evidence.
RELATED STORIES:
- Laken Riley murder case: Evidence hearing for Jose Ibarra may be delayed
- Athens DA bringing in top trial attorney for Laken Riley’s murder case after criticism from lawyers
- Laken Riley murder: Immigration attorney explains suspect’s path from Venezuela to Georgia
- Jose and Diego Ibarra: Court documents reveal immigration, criminal past in the United States
- Laken Riley murder: Affidavits reveal disturbing details about death of 22-year-old nursing student
The factors of this initial detention and search warrant, accused of being unlawful, are being described as the source of “fruit of the poisonous tree” for all subsequent evidence seized and search warrants executed, so the defense is requesting the court suppress all of it at trial.
The evidence collected in the case includes two Samsung Galaxy phones said to belong to Ibarra, in addition to the contents of his social media accounts and accounts he’s associated with. Additional data provided to law enforcement by Google, Inc. for geolocations of the cell phones in question are also being described as the same “poisonous fruit” and included in the motion to suppress.
Ibarra’s peeping Tom charge, Count 10 in the indictment, is due to an accusation that Ibarra had looked through the window of an apartment in a university housing building the same day Riley was killed. That’s why his attorneys have asked the court to separate it from the felony murder trial focused on Riley’s death.
The defendant has maintained his innocence in court, pleading not guilty to the charges of murdering Riley and the others. Ibarra and his attorneys are expected in court at 10 a.m. on Friday.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
:quality(70)/d1hfln2sfez66z.cloudfront.net/08-02-2024/t_dc0c969dcdc74bb7928243dce9a786d3_name_laken_riley_jose_ibarra.png)
©2024 Cox Media Group
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/cmg/JKW34C6HOVEB3B4K4OG6HDCABE.jpg)
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/cmg/M5ANR665Y5HTJB3SHLZTTOTLGY.jpeg)
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/cmg/LCHPHNJP4BF5PHCSNII7O247VE.jpg)
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/cmg/3UU5FUNKORDZJK5TYRCBDVA7WE.jpeg)
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/cmg/LXKBQZDQUZDXPMTACGZ43FIREA.jpeg)